This morning at 10 a.m. on Midmorning, Kerri Miller talks to Dr. Pauline Chen and Dr. Donald Berwick talk about healthcare and how to talk to doctors to get more involved in their care. Listen in at 10 a.m. CDT and add your comments here. In the words of the Midmorning producers (from the webpage):
Putting the patient first
Patient-centered care sounds like a given, but it's not always. Two doctors talk about how to convince doctors to really listen to their patients and get them more involved in their care.
We've most likely all been there. A team of doctors, nurses, and/or residents comes in, and they talk amongst themselves using large, scientific words about what's wrong with us, and we have no idea what they're saying. "Oooh, we've got ankyrin deficiency..." says our doctor to the others. What does that even mean?
Do you ever feel out of the loop of your healthcare? Does it bother you? Do you try to fix the situation? What works for you, and what doesn't?
Â
This is an open discussion, so you're welcome to link to your related Gather articles or other online resources. Your comments & articles may be quoted on http://minnesota.publicradio.org/your_voice/ or on mpr.org.
______________
Eliza Hartley
Digital Media Intern
Minnesota Public Radio
American Public Media
Â




Comments: 11
Personally I prefer skill over all else.
I want control of my health care. If the government is in charge, there is nowhere to go if I'm not happy with the service I'm getting.
You make an excellent point about teaching hospitals, Francesca. We may feel on the outskirts, even during the simplest of procedures, but generally teaching hospitals are at the forefront of medical technology (that's not always the case, though...I know thanks to personal experience with...we'll call it..."the wart that wouldn't go away"). You do make a very good point, though, one which lots of people would agree with. Have you had personal experience to bring you to your conclusion?
The tough stuff is having to lose weight, Winston? What's "you have colon cancer", then? (Heaven forbid). You're right, though, there definitely are doctors who love what they do. No doubt about it. It's great that you have healthcare, but what is your opinion of those who don't?
If you are in severe pain, you better hope your doctor likes you more than the hassles than he's going to get with the DEA if [the doctor] thinks a Vicodin or Oxycontin is the best choice for relief of your pain. If you are the nervous type, your doctor will give you a "drowsy anti-histamine" rather than a benzodiazepin. And, after all, all Medicaid and Medicare drug plans specifically exclude Valium and Xanax, etc. Even Klonopin which is used for treatment in epilepsy is forbidden.
Now the "surprise" here is that people think this situation doesn't exist already just because they haven't encountered it. Or maybe they are convinced that the $20-a-pill, latest greatest migraine remedy works for them rather than a plain ol' aspirin/codeine combo that costs about .000001 cents to make and about 10 cents each to buy.
Ever since my 82-year-old doctor finally retired, I avoid doctors like the plague. I have no illusions that they care about me. I don't trust them.
How do we help those folks out without screwing with the other 98% who have it?
Why does this sound like a huge government control thing?
Do we include ilegal aliens?
How do we encourage people off of government health care once they can afford their own.
Part of the goal of the SHCIPS and OBamacare is to get as many people as possible dependant on another government program, so those people will be dependant on politicians for their livelihood. That's what makes it difficult.
I love all the people that bellyached about the Bush Administration monitoring calls as part of homeland security but have no problem with a future Republican administration having their medical records.