| Enlightenment: Is Science Ready to Take it Seriously? |
| JEFF WARREN - Psychology Tomorrow |
| I’m not given to making grand predictions, but in this case I can’t resist: the very real spiritual transformation at the heart of mysticism is about to explode into the secular mainstream, and the consequences may just revolutionize our scientific understanding of the mind. Yowzer! No doubt the reader’s New Age flapdoodle-detector is now shrieking. Bear with me. Let’s first get the tricky business of defining enlightenment out of the way. For expediency’s sake, I’ll define enlightenment as a complex and multi-faceted process by which the mind comes to know – and over time rest more securely in – its own ground. As this happens, our habitual sense of being a separate and bounded self begins to fade. Ultimately, the person for whom this happens no longer feels themselves to be an autonomous entity looking out at an external world; rather, they feel themselves, more and more, to ... |
Read More - |
by
Clarke M.
Member since:
July 20, 2006 Enlightenment: Is Science Ready to Take it Seriously?
January 28, 2013 09:04 AM UTC
views: 0
|
1 person recommends this
|
comments: 4
Find more about:
culture,
psychology education,
human rights civil liberties,
intelligence,
nature,
science,
consciousness
Find Gather groups:
Gather Health Essential, Catholic Spiritual Circle, Think About This, ONE HUMAN FAMILY, Our Soul Journey, Global News & Views, Opinionated Opinions, Politics and Social Justice, Truth Seekers, 4 US, World News & Opinions, Gather Spirituality Essentials: Examining Our Religion, Spirituality Explorers, Losing Your Religion
Please provide details below to help Gather review this content. If it is found to be inappropriate and in violation of the Gather Terms of Service, action will be taken.
You have successfully submitted a report for this post.
|
|
|
||||
About Gather |
Engagement Marketing |
Gather Points |
Advertise on Gather |
Gather Press |
Privacy |
Terms of Service |
Community Guidelines
Books | Business | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Giveaways | Health | Money | Moms | News | Politics | Sports | Style | Technology | Travel | Writing
Books | Business | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Giveaways | Health | Money | Moms | News | Politics | Sports | Style | Technology | Travel | Writing
Version 18247, "Zach"; Copyright © 2013 Gather Inc. All rights reserved.





Comments: 4
But naturalism is completely irrational. Thus, in the eyes of Jeff Warren, as irrationality describes (and derives) everything , then how can one use rationality or reason to defend anything?